As I see it ...

17th August, 2008

I read the other day that the American fundamentalist group “Focus on Family” have urged anyone who will listen, to pray for torrential rain.  On the face of it you would think, “Ah they’re responding to the drought situation.”  But alas no!  The call for prayer was directed to the open-air acceptance speech of Barack Obama scheduled to be made in Denver Colorado on 28th of August. And I shake my head in absolute bemusement at the theological mindset behind enlisting God’s help in a political campaign. What is even sadder is that Focus on Family will have millions of adherents that will probably be praying madly on the 28th to bring about divine intervention.

Such behaviour is only possible if you live in a closed system. A closed system is any system sealed off from the outside world, where the internal logic of the group makes complete sense only to the group.  And an even more extreme example was on show last Monday night with the Four Corners report on a doomsday cult, again in the US, that forecasted the end of the world to occur at midnight on the 31st of August 2007, a date prophesied by the leader of the cult, who chose to be known as Michael the Messiah. The film crew making the documentary were not part of the closed system, and of course were interested to see what would happen at midnight on the 31st, so they arrived at the gate of the property to hear, on the stroke of midnight, a lamb’s horn being sounded followed by the cult members milling around and shouting “free at last” and generally praising God. It mattered not that they and the world was still there –Michael had foretold the end of the world and so it must be. Michael was free to continue to prey on young impressionable women, for that in the main was the make up of his cult.  To anyone outside the cult it was clear that their leader was engaged in self-serving behaviour, and indeed Michael has been charged with a number of offences by the authorities in New Mexico.

As I see it, however, in any organisation, even conventional churches, there is a danger of operating in a closed system, all the more so when there is a strong charismatic leader at the head. There is always a need for Christian faith communities to be transparent, and to be faithful to our true leader, Jesus the Christ. And for me the best reality check is the one that Jesus himself applied – “By their fruits so shall you know them.” It’s not what we say that is real, it is what we do.  And what we do should always be informed by the loving gospel of Jesus Christ.

Tony Duncan




10th August, 2008

On Wednesday of this week our middle daughter obtained a divorce. It marked the formal ending of a relationship that went back over ten years. As anyone who has gone through the painful process knows, it is a time of sadness, and often the divorce itself is accompanied by a strong feeling of emptiness. Here is a legal acknowledgement that a relationship with all its dreams, all its hopes, has not worked. And whilst it frees up individuals to start afresh, I believe that there is always grief for the death of the relationship, a grief that extends further than the two people involved.

So it was with some awed bemusement that I received my daily email from Eureka Street – the Jesuit web publication, that had an article by Brian Doyle entitled “Funeral for a Marriage.” Let me quote some of the article to you.

About 240,000 Australians are born every year. We have a sacrament to welcome them.   About 130,000 Australians die every year. We have a sacrament to say farewell. About 100,000 Australians get married every year. We have a sacrament to celebrate their nutty courage. About 50,000 Australians get divorced every year. We have no sacrament for them.

Something crucial and wonderful and holy and sweet and salty between that man and that woman sickened and withered and died, without public mourning or witness or ritual, without communal attention and respect.

It dies shivering the souls of the formerly married and their children and their friends, and the Church has nothing to say, turns and looks away, frowns and castigates, and everyone shuffles forward into the muddled future, trying to repair their shattered hearts.

Maybe there should be a sacrament for the end of a marriage. Maybe we should gather as a people to witness and mourn the death of love and hope. Maybe we should create a ritual by which we honour their brave attempt, and formally conclude their failed endeavour.

Maybe we should offer the people we love and respect a day of dignity to close an immensely painful chapter, to publicly offer our support to women and men and children, in the same way that we publicly offered our support and witness on the day they vowed to honour each other all the days of their lives.

With about 40% of marriages now ending in divorce As I See It, the church can no longer afford to take the high moral ground (not that it ever could). A century ago in Australia there were fewer than five divorces per annum in Australia.

Now the social reality is that all of us know individuals who have gone through the trauma of divorce. There is increasing evidence, at least in the Uniting Church that divorce no longer has the stigma attached to it as it once had. We have some sensitive liturgies for such occasions developed by Dorothy McRae-McMahon. As Christians we are called to those places of pain in our neighbours lives to bring the live-giving love of God’s grace. If the Gospel of Jesus Christ is about death and renewal, then surely our place is next to those who travel through the dark valley of divorce.

Tony Duncan





3rd August, 2008

The other day, someone came into my office and out of the blue asked me what I understood by the term “redemption.” Now I have to say it’s not a question that I get asked often, in fact it’s the first time, and I was taken aback.  Redemption is a theological loaded word. It’s very much a “church word” and you rarely see it used outside of a church context and I guess that’s why my inquiring friend was asking a minister of the church.

Now I could have spent some time describing how God in Jesus Christ redeemed all of us, talking about how Jesus came as an ordinary man, lived our life and died our death and through God’s power was raised to life again; that in his death and resurrection we are saved. But I didn’t think that was what he was wanting, he’d been told these things all his church life. What did I mean by “redemption”?

Thinking on my feet, I told him that I thought redemption had something to do with wholeness. I have a strong belief that all of us are in need of wholeness and healing. As I See It, it is as if we are incomplete. All human beings are made with a spiritual yearning. We all, regardless of culture, religion or race have this deep yearning to understand why we are here, to make sense of suffering and evil and to find meaning in our lives. It’s as if we are incomplete. So as a Christian, to experience redemption is to be offered wholeness, a wholeness that can be seen in the life of Jesus. Jesus shows us what it means to be a truly whole person in the way he lived and in what he taught.

But redemption, wholeness, is a search that we are all engaged in regardless of race colour or creed. I know this because I can see all the world religions come down to a search for wholeness, a need for lives that are authentic, lives connected to our Creator.

So as a Christian minister I want to offer that wholeness in a language that can be understood. Sometimes that language is in loving actions, or in the words of St. Francis of Assisi –“preach Christ’s gospel, and as a last resort use words.” In other words if we need to speak to a person’s deep need for wholeness it is not words but loving acts that will achieve that end. It’s not about saving souls, it about caring and loving deeply enough for the whole person that sometimes there’s no need to mention God or church, because God’s presence is there in abundance in loving-kindness.

In that respect Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan is a story of redemption, a story of offering wholeness – not because the Samaritan wanted the injured man to become a Samaritan like himself, but because in the injured one the Samaritan saw a fellow traveller – someone seeking wholeness. So in the caring and in the healing the giver as well as the injured one is made whole. That’s true redemption and often it can happen without any mention of religion. Wholeness is there from our Creator for everyone.

Tony Duncan




27th July, 2008

As a minister of religion one of my problems is that I find it hard to go to another service without critiquing it. It’s difficult for me be still and know God when I’m in another church. If I’m not actively looking for things that will enhance our worship here at Pilgrim I find myself being amazed at what does or what does not happen in church services away from Pilgrim. Several times I’ve been surprised when there has been no “prayers of the people” – where intercessory prayer has been limited solely to what was going on within that church community.

But I have to say that the saddest omission I’ve experienced when visiting occurred in another Uniting congregation. Like many of our churches these days the service was full of grey-haired people. There were a few children though and my sadness that day had to do with the fact that there was no recognition of them during the early part of the service. Even when they were about to depart for Sunday School, the teacher had to remind the worship leader that this was about to happen.

If we want to encourage our children to come to worship, then we need to involve them in worship. Liturgy is the work of the people, and that includes children. Recognition of our children as a valuable contributing part of our congregation is evidenced by the facilities that are available for them. A toy corner with soft toys that have not been recycled is a start, but more importantly is an attitude that sees children as a blessing and not a noisy distraction during worship.  And if we are to value the place of children in our church community we need to resource those who work with them adequately. So it is with some satisfaction that five of our congregation were able to attend a workshop in Melbourne yesterday looking at how to enhance our family and children ministry.

As I see it, we do take our children and family ministry seriously at Pilgrim. But there is no room for complacency. With the recent influx of babies into the congregation it has been gratifying to see the response of congregation members to the formation of a small nursery group during worship. But our concern for families and children needs to go beyond the gathered community on a Sunday morning. How can we encourage the development of small groups that can gather perhaps apart from Sunday mornings?  We live in a society where families are no longer as free on Sunday mornings as they were once. What can we offer our young families apart from Sunday Worship?  Most of the impetus needs to come from the young families themselves but how can we encourage and resource the new forms of church that need to emerge if we are pass on the faith that has meant so much to each of us.

I look forward to conversations with the young families themselves so that Pilgrim will remain a congregation where children are valued and encouraged to grow in the faith.

Tony Duncan




20th July, 2008

The front page  of Friday’s Melbourne Age  had a half page photograph of Pope Benedict XVI, resplendent in a red cloak that streamed behind him like a super hero, as he made his way down Sydney Harbour in his “boat-a-cade”! And I smiled to myself and not for the first time I shook my head in wonder and awe about the institutional church. You see I have this love-hate relationship with the institutional church (and by church, I mean all the Christian churches including my own).

At times I can look at what is done in the name of the church and cringe with embarrassment and shame. I’ve often said the church is good at shooting itself in the foot and the events in Sydney this week reflect some of that, with ill-considered comments by those who should know better about those who have been victims of clergy abuse.  None the less I have to say I’m in agreement with my Baptist friend in Sydney who texted me on Thursday with the cryptic comment “Slowly moving from cynicism to respect.”

And for me the biggest reason for my movement from cynicism to respect is the message the Pope brings to those young pilgrims in Sydney for the World Youth Day festival. Whilst lamenting a world “grown weary of greed, exploitation and division, of the tedium of false idols and the pain of false promises,” he points them to Christ. “Christ offers more. Indeed he offers everything.”

My hope would be that at the centre of what is happening in Sydney is not the Pope but Christ. And if you can get hundreds of thousands of young people enthused about the Way of Christ then something “true good and beautiful” is happening. To-day, Sunday, half a million people will gather at Randwick Racecourse and an estimated billion people worldwide will see and hear the gospel proclaimed. And that cannot be a bad thing. However I’m not so naive as to believe that the young people present are not there to have good time. Most are there for the thrill of the occasion but there will be some who take Christ’s message to their hearts and for them World Youth Day in Sydney 2008 will be life changing.

As I see it the huge response to World Youth Day indicates the great thirst young people have to explore spiritual depths. In a world that values material and rationalism above all else, young people can see that to live fulfilled lives they will need more that their possession and rationality, all the more so as our world faces a resources crisis. So if we as Church are to meet their spiritual yearnings, we will have to offer them more than the dry 19th Century conservatism that exists in most of our mainline churches. We need to build healthy, love-filled communities where the most vulnerable are safe and where Christ’s gospel is lived out and not just preached.

Tony Duncan




13th July, 2008

Two weeks ago at our combined service we interrupted our service by having morning tea half way through. The theme had been on welcoming to community, and at the time it was thought a good idea that the congregations might have a time where they could spend time getting to know each other better and to speak with one another about what’s going on in their lives. On the whole the move was well received but there were some who saw it as an intrusion into church worship. It reminded me of a time when I introduced “Passing the Peace” into one of my early congregations only to be told by one parishioner that – “such actions in church were hypocritical and why I should offer someone my hand when I don’t do so at the door.”

As I see it, it is now possible to go to church and say nothing of importance to anyone. It has become so easy for congregations to adopt a consumer mentality. Easy for people to sit and be entertained. We can come and be prayed at, preached at, at times even sung at, and then return home. Opportunities to share deeply about things that matter seem few and far between. We’ve become such a private people.  By contrast I’ve just spent three days at a ministers' retreat, and experienced a different form of community. One where there was enough trust between us that we could unburden ourselves. Where we could take off our ecclesiastical mask and share at that deep level. And in the honest sharing we found God along side us.  Sadly such sharing is often not possible in a congregation, and as a church generally, we are dying because of our lack of trust and unwillingness to be open to one another.

Think back to an experience of church where you felt totally accepted, totally cared for, totally loved. And I’d be willing to wager that for most of us that experience was in a small group. For Jenny and me it has always been in small groups. Before training for the ministry, Jenny and I belonged to a small group of four families that met to eat together every second Sunday afternoon. We prayed together, studied together, even played together and built a solid relationship with each other in Jesus Christ. Similarly, in congregations since my ordinations it has been in small study groups that we have felt totally at home.

That’s not to say that Sunday worship is not important or that we can’t develop times when we can share more intimately. But there is a limit to what one can do on a Sunday with a congregation of 100+. However it shouldn’t stop us from having our times of sharing. And if you’re interested in being part of a small group specifically for faith sharing, let me know.

Tony Duncan




6th July, 2008

Who’d be a leader in today’s world? As I read my daily newspaper, as I listen to radio and watch TV, it’s as if someone has declared open season on our leaders. And it’s not just our political masters I’m talking about. In every field, business, medicine, the law, education and, it seems, especially the church – being a leader is harder than it has ever been. Our media is primed to sniff out any and every imperfection. And it sees it as “in the public interest” that each peccadillo of our leaders is plastered over our front pages. The side affect is that we no longer trust anyone in authority and at a time when real leadership is so badly needed in our world, few are willing to put their head on the chopping block and some of us are beginning to feel dispirited, even depressed.

So when did our leaders turn bad? As a child, growing up in the church, we had leaders. In the Catholic Church of my childhood, “Father” always knew best. As a child our political leaders were beyond reproach. But now everyone has a voice. We are all experts – no matter the field, just listen to talk back radio! We expect more from our leaders and are less likely to accept that anyone knows best.

Of course with increased scrutiny many of our leaders don’t help themselves. The last 20 years has seen a succession of leaders end up in the courts, and the new philosophy of screwing the system for all its worth has meant that ethical behaviour in all walks of life is under challenge. There is no such thing as conflict of interest. Minimizing tax is considered the honourable thing to do.

In the church in recent years we have seen the need to create a code of ethics to inform ministry workers how to behave properly. How ironic! But not surprising. The church has always mirrored the society in which it has found itself.

But as I see it, we Christians do have the means to address the crisis in leadership we face today. We have an example of servant leadership in Jesus Christ that is even more relevant today than ever before. In Christ, leaders are there to serve. A job is a vocation, a calling and a person’s worth is not determined by how much he or she earns. I’ve always found the argument that the more one knows, the higher the qualification the more money one should be paid, is at heart an unchristian one. In Christ, the worth of a person is not determined by how much they earn or how well educated the person is. We are all children of God. It’s our economy that puts on the prices not our theology. I long for the time when the more one is educated, the more talented a person is, then the more responsibility a person has to serve his or her community. Now there’s real leadership. Leadership that seeks to give and not count the cost. Leadership that mirrors the self-giving love of the Christ we follow.

Tony Duncan




29th June, 2008

Last Tuesday night the Church Council spent some of its time looking at “Pilgrim Uniting Church’s Response to Greenhouse,” a paper provided for us by one of our members, Doug Ford.  On the face of it you could wonder what on earth has a response to greenhouse to do with Christian faith. And why was our Council wasting their time on such a worldly issue?

Well as I see it, our environment and what we are doing to it is something that Christians should be vitally concerned with. The Scriptures maintain that we are stewards of God’s world and have been asked to care for God’s creation. Sadly we humans have read that as bending our physical environment to suit ourselves. Typically we have over-reached ourselves and sought to dominate completely our environment and are literally reaping the whirlwind. For too long the Christian Church has supported the development at all costs mentality of our society. We have taken the view that ecology has nothing to do with theology.

But for me a more telling argument for Christians being involved with ecological balance is that the harm we are inflicting upon our planet is most harmful to those who are poorest. The benefits of so called development go to the richer nations at the expense of poorer nations. The food crisis that the world faces today is hardly felt in developed countries. We complain about rising prices but millions starve because crops are failing or are being diverted into bio-fuels. For the poor the current ecological crisis is catastrophic. The poor are the ones who will lose their homes, their livelihood, their lives as the world warms and we worry about the tax relief so we can maintain our cars.

Ultimately how we deal with the ecological crises of global warming and energy depletion is a justice issue. And as a Christian Church surely we need to live out the gospel imperative of caring for the poor. It’s more than hypocritical if we deplore the greed and unconcern that drives much of the development in our world and not look at the little we can do as a congregation.

Accordingly Doug Ford has provided for us preliminary estimates of our greenhouse emissions as a church.  He has estimated that we emit just under 30 tonnes of carbon emissions per annum. This is in the form of energy costs, travel on church business and our use of paper. His work has helped the Church Council to focus on conservation of energy and we have decided to move to recycled paper and to look at practical ways to conserve our energy output. In addition we intend to expend a small amount to offset our greenhouse gas emissions by paying a reputable off-setting organization (Greenfleet) to offset our emissions.

Wouldn’t it be good if each of our congregation’s households was to look to similar actions? As Christians we can make a difference to our world. And that most definitely includes acting to heal our planet.

Tony Duncan





22 June, 2008

As I’m writing this As I See It, our new church notice boards are being erected. And it got me to thinking. How important are the signs we put up outside our churches?  Do they tell us much about what goes on inside the church buildings. Do they tell us much about the church community and how it operates?  Well I have to say that in my experience the answer to both questions is a resounding “yes.” Our notice boards and the state of our grounds can often be a good indicator of the way the church people are feeling about themselves. If the notice board looks tired, the people are generally tired. In one church I was involved with they had a small sign, partly shielded by a big tree with faded writing which was hard for anyone to notice. It took four years of agitating to have a new sign put up, partly because the sign had been donated to the church by people long since dead and we were afraid to upset anyone. But the new sign was only possible when the congregation felt better about themselves and were confident enough to broadcast their faith, knowing that they had something to offer their community other than Sunday services.

Bold and confident notice boards can signify a bold and confident church community.  Similarly the state of our church grounds can give out unintended messages. Some of you may have wondered why I was so keen to be rid of the large trees that hid the beauty of our church building. I love trees but I love Pilgrim more and I want what Pilgrim can offer in Jesus Christ to be seen and heard and experienced.  I have heard more than one person comment that they were unaware that this was a church building. The outer states of our church buildings are like body language – they often give a good indication of the mood of the place.

But it’s not just the physical state of our notice boards that is important. Often it’s what we put on these boards that can tell us even more about the congregation. I have to admit that there are pious and moralistic statements plastered upon notice boards that make me want to cringe. And I’m sympathetic to the message of Christ, so I wonder what it does to those the message is often targeted to – the non-Christian. Messages that judge or exclude, however cleverly worded, are a turn off.  It is hard enough getting people into churches these days without implying that you have to be holy to come to church and that going to church will make everything right in your life.

And then there are even subtler messages often on display that can give more than the message intended. Take the one I saw recently to which I took great offence. “Live your life so that when you die the preacher will not have to tell lies about you.” Very clever.  But as a preacher, I hope I never have to tell lies. Perhaps the message “The truth will make you free!” needs to be the follow up message. So beware. Our notice boards often tell people far more about ourselves than we realise.

Tony Duncan





15 June, 2008

‘Hell’ is a topic I talk about very carefully and not very often. In fact it’s a topic that most mainline ministers are very wary of.   We leave the subject to our more theologically conservative brothers and sisters, washing our hands Pilate-like. Not for us the pulpit thumping threats of hell and damnation to all who ignore our calls to repent. We’d much rather love people into the kingdom.  Yet “hell” isn’t going away any time soon.

And the reason I’m inflicting the topic on you now is that this week I received the latest edition of “Christian Century” and there, as the cover story, was “What to say about hell.”  Eight theologians were asked to comment on “Hell” and to my surprise all of them agreed, that “Hell is a nonnegotiable item in the Christian vocabulary. It has scriptural roots, it is there in the earliest creeds and it has been a staple of Christian preaching and art since almost the beginning.” (Paul Griffiths –Duke Divinity School)

And whilst I’d agree with them I still think the problem with “hell” in our world today is that we have relegated it to the afterlife.  For many Christians, ‘hell’ is a place you go to when you die – if you’ve rejected God’s way. But as I see it “hell” exists with many of us here and now. Millions of people are living hellish lives, with no hope, no future, no escape, and no God.

The classical definition of “hell” has been living with the absence of God, and you do not need to wait for the life hereafter to see that condition. In Victor Frankel great book, “Man’s Search for Meaning” he describes his experience in the hell that was his concentration camp in Nazi Germany. He observed that those with a relationship with God were the ones who were able to survive. Living in hellish conditions, they were not in hell.

And I wonder if this is not a word of hope to us in the 21st Century where so much seems to be hellish in our world. As Christians perhaps we too like Christ are called to “descend into hell” as our creeds claim happened to Jesus after death, and to bring hope and life to people whose daily life is hell.  None of us really knows what life after death will be like, heaven or hell, but we know what life here and now is like and we as Christians have the means of doing something about choice of heaven or hell in our day to day living. And if life without God, ‘hell’, is as bad as we believe then perhaps knowing this will encourage us to help people to get to know our God through us and leave their own personal hell.

Let me close though with a story I have used many times before, a story from the St. Bernard tradition.  In a vision an angel announces that she is going to torch the pleasures of heaven and quench the fires of hell, so people will start loving God for God’s own sake.

Tony Duncan



8th June, 2008

Recently our Church Council made a decision to rename “the cloisters” in our church. We decided to call that enclosed part of our church property that links the commercial part of our city with the civic part, “Pilgrim Way”.  Hum, ho, I hear you sigh. So what?

Well, as I see it, words matter.  The language we use can sometimes limit understanding to the initiated few by using jargon. I have sat often in meetings of public servants and listened to them rattle off initials of organisation and positions as if everyone would know what the OM of a QANGO was.  Communication by acronyms!  It was alright when I was a public servant myself, part of the in-group but now when I’ve found myself an outsider in such meetings, I am totally mystified, having to learn afresh what a “MoU with DHHS and NGOs” means. And I’m still not sure what an IAST is. And I remember vividly recently when I sat in a meeting of computer experts discussing how we could redesign our website, totally bewildered.

Specialists of all sorts have their own language. I’m sure it has been created to ease communications among themselves, but the inevitable by-product of such language is that it excludes others.  And so it is with the church. Few people today know what a cloister is. And if they do, they often associate it with a place for closed religious orders where only the initiated or ordained can walk. This certainly is not what we have in mind for Pilgrim Walk.

But just as important is the use of in words in church. I remember when I was studying theology being introduced to a raft of new words that even after a lifetime in churches I had no idea about. What after all does “instantiation” mean? And does it matter!  So in our services when we use words like justification, sanctification, righteousness and even sin, perhaps we as the initiated may know what they are all about – but what of someone entering our hallowed doors for the first time – does our language make much sense to them?

The problem of language becomes even more of an issue when we sing the lyrics of some of our old hymns –what does “mine eyes diffused” mean anyway? I enjoy singing the song but sometimes have no idea what I’m singing about. And of course if you are the sort of Christian who believes that the King James Version of the Holy Scriptures is God’s version, then the problem is compounded further. Christians have a message of God’s inclusive love to tell. Surely we can tell it in language that is readily understood by all. So let’s not be cloistered, let us walk our pilgrim way into a world that is desperately seeking meaning. And if you find your preacher lapsing at times into theological jargon, gently remind him that the gospel is for everyone, not just the initiated few.

Tony Duncan




1st June, 2008

Well they say travel broadens the mind, and I certainly have had my mind broadened over the past 4 weeks. Whenever I travel abroad, I have this problem,  I love to visit places of worship. I’m not too fussy about their theological tradition, I’m just fascinated in the myriad of ways we human beings approach God.

Our first stop was Doha, that’s right the capital of Qatar, and there we had lunch with Rev. Bill Swartz and his wife Edie. (They are friends of the Cockers). Bill enthusiastically showed the plans for a multi-million dollar worship centre for all the Protestants in Doha. The government has given the land and asked Bill to oversee the establishment of a worship centre. It’s a grand affair in keeping with the development going around it. However what moved me more than the impressive plans for the worship centre was the  congregation that is to meet there. In the main it is the indentured Christian workforce to whom Bill and Edie will minister. A group of people who are all strangers in a strange land, with little or no legal protection.  Bill and Edie bring a message of hope to the poor and dispossessed and are working hard to raise the money needed for a worship centre. But there is no doubt, they have clear mission focus.

Then there was magnificent Gothic Eastern Catholic cathedral in Prague’s Old Town. Jenny and I were accidental attenders of a Mass in the cathedral that seemed and did go for hours. We were attracted by the posters advertising a concert by the Prague Chamber Orchestra. We returned the following evening and were treated to an exquisite evening of heavenly music. This church together with four or five others saw their ministry in presenting world class music to the many tourists in Prague and in so doing there was no doubt they had a clear mission focus.

And the third was a Methodist church in Ludlow in Shropshire. Of all the churches we visited, this came closest to ours. Set in the centre of the tourist town, Ludlow, we were first attracted by the numbers of people going into the building. It was the middle of the week, and a closer inspection revealed that they had a café – Wesleys Café that seemed to be doing a roaring trade. Their café was in the foyer part of the church, glassed off from the worship centre. They had a balcony over the café again glassed off from the worship centre which acted as a very comfortable meeting area and occasional chapel. The manager of the café told me that the church had gone into debt, but that the development had revitalised their church and were reaching out to the community around them. Once
again a congregation with a clear mission focus.

And I wondered about possibilities for Pilgrim.  Three very different churches all seeking to serve God in the where they are.  Clarity of mission is even more important in today’s world where the church is often seen as irrelevant. At Pilgrim are we clear about who we are and who we are called to serve?

Tony Duncan





25 May, 2008

Recently I read a touching short story by Michael Frost entitled “The Wisdom of Wal Richards” (in “Australian Stories for the Spirit”, available in the Ida Birchall Library).  Wal was intellectually and physically disabled, speech impaired, and unable to read or write.  Daily he sat on his favourite bench at the intersection of the main streets in the small Victorian town of Maryborough.  He greeted people as they walked by, but was unable to converse with them.

Somewhere around the age of 20, he procured a Box Brownie camera.  As he clicked away with shaking hands, most assumed he had no film in the camera or did not know how to take a photograph.

Wal’s favourite photo shoots were weddings, and it is estimated he attended an amazing 2,000 of them.  Invited or not, he’d attend.  Some would set a place at a table for him.  Others would keep quiet, hoping he’d not find out.  But he still turned up.  He’d cycle long distances, or catch a train to Melbourne.  He became an integral part of local weddings.  Brides and bridesmaids took centre stage, with the grooms at the edge of the images.

After Wal’s death in 1997, aged 66, his family discovered 20,000 unlabelled photographs in his back shed.  The images that no one thought would turn out were extraordinary.  4,000 were chosen for an exhibition, and decades of memories were displayed with huge interest and great acclaim.  Wal, the wedding photographer, gave Maryborough its greatest fame.  The wisdom he could share in no other way was there for all to see.

Undoubtedly this story appeals to the photographer in me, and I’m a bit of a softie with tales like this.  They make me pause, and reconsider my priorities.  Everyone’s life has a value.  And I never mind the gentle reminders that our God can and does accomplish extraordinary things with un-extraordinary people in un-extraordinary situations.  As I see it, it is good to remember this when we feel so small... and wonder what contribution we could possibly make.....

Wendy Cocker




18 May, 2008

Last weekend I attended the Annual Meeting of the Tasmanian Council of Churches. It was a day when Anglicans, Baptists, Catholics, Unitings, Quakers and Salvation Army people gathered to discuss our common concerns and interests.

In recent years there has been what some have called an “ecumenical winter”, and some of the hopes that we might have had in the 1970s and1980s for a wider union of churches now seem very remote. Nevertheless it is important to recognise the enormous advances that have been made in relationships between the churches in our lifetime. I recently preached in the Church of the Apostles, yet when I was a youth it would have been unheard of for a Protestant minister to preach in a Catholic church.

Also, we need to acknowledge that although moves towards union of churches have come to nothing, there have been great strides in the movement towards unity. Increasingly we see that there is much more that unites us than divides us. Even in our worship, there are many similarities in our litanies (especially for the sacraments – and the use of a common lectionary has helped that).

At the TCC last weekend we had an afternoon forum on baptism. There are clearly differences between churches over whether infants should be baptised, and some Christian communities such as the Salvationists and the Quakers do not practise baptism. But the others all use the same Trinitarian words “I baptise you in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit”, and most of the churches recognise the baptism administered by another church. In fact seven denominations (including our own) use a common baptismal certificate. And each of the churches affirms that the baptism they administer is into Christ’s church – not their particular denomination.

So despite our differences, baptism in fact unites the churches. Thanks be to God.

Allan Thompson



11 May, 2008

Excerpts from:  “Enough Is Enough”  by Walter Brueggemann

We live in a world where the gap between scarcity and abundance grows wider every day. Whether at the level of nations or neighbourhoods, this widening gap is polarising people, making each camp more and more suspicious and antagonistic toward the other…

An affirmation of abundance says just the opposite…  There is enough to go around, so long as each of us takes only what we need…   The Bible is about abundance.  From the first chapters of Genesis, God not only initiates abundance - calling forth plants and fish and birds and animals - but promises continued abundance by commanding them to "increase and multiply" (1:22). God's generosity and fidelity reach their climax on the sixth day, when God proclaims a sufficiency…  Having thus set in motion a world of abundance, God rests - the mechanisms are in place, the world will have enough…  [Sabbath]

Today, the fundamental human condition continues to be anxiety, fuelled by a market ideology that keeps pounding on us to take more, to not think about our neighbour, to be fearful, short-sighted, grudging. One glaring example of today's anxiety-driven scarcity is the frenetic activity that so characterizes our society.  Corporate executives boast a "24/7" mentality as a bulwark against losing their edge or missing an opportunity.  Those of us with less "prestigious" positions continually wrestle with our bulging appointment books and ever-growing to-do lists…  youngsters have exchanged a carefree childhood for a schedule of structured activities…

The Bible offers an antidote to all this activity:  the call to …Sabbath is based on abundance.  A Sabbath spent catching up on chores we were too busy to do during the week is hardly a testimony to abundance  Too often, the church has understood God's unconditional grace as solely a theological phenomenon, instead of recognizing that it has to do with the reordering of the economy of the world…

When we gather as church each Sunday, we should ponder the stories that declare scarcity to be false: an impromptu hillside meal with as much in left-overs as when it began, a barren desert blossoming with manna, an earth fully equipped to meet everyone's needs.  And a question should be burning in our hearts…

[Read the full article on our website 'Home' page if you enjoyed this.]

Andrea Bartley




4 May, 2008

Feathers on the Breath of God Like Catching Water in a Net

In her book
Like catching Water in a Net Val Webb quotes from Deuteronomy 4: 15 -9 which warned Hebrew people not  to make any images of that which they experienced - warning us of boxing Divinity into a human-like form:

    Since you saw no form when the Lord spoke to you     at Horeb …
    Take care and watch yourselves closely, so that
    you do not act corruptly by making an idol for             yourselves
    in the form of any figure – the likeness of male or         female,
    the likeness of any animal that is on the earth,
    the likeness of any winged bird that flies in the air,
    the likeness of anything that creeps on the ground,
    The likeness of any fish that is in the water under         the earth.
    And when you look up to the heavens and see the         sun,
    The moon, and the stars, all the host of heaven, do     not be led astray
    And bow down to them and serve them.

And in her own words on  the ‘formlessness’ of the     Divine:
    You are the thought before I speak
    You are the urge before I sing
    You are the nudge before I act
    You are the spring before I walk
    You are the prayer before I sleep
    You are the dawn before I wake
    You are the breath before I live.

God is new each day. He is a constant source of new possibilities … God is absolute freedom.  And that means that, as long as human history has not been completed, as long as the totality of  history has not been given, we cannot know God’s being – there is always something more and so there is always openness.  And even the totality of history does not coincide with God’s activity.<>

        Edward Schilebeeckx

Caroline Ball




27 April, 2008

At our Church Council meeting last Tuesday night, Greg James led our devotions with this provocative reading from a book called
“Believe – The words and inspiration of Desmond Tutu” I thought it worthy of repeating as it reflects “As I see it.” It also dovetails perfectly with this Sunday’s gospel, John 14: 15-21.


In my culture and tradition, says Desmond Tutu, the highest praise that can be given to someone is, “Yu, u nobuntu”, an acknowledgement that he or she has this wonderful quality, “ubuntu”. It is a reference to their actions towards their fellow human beings, it has to do with how they regard people and how they see themselves within their intimate relationships, their familial relationships and within the broader community. Ubuntu addresses the central tenet of African philosophy: the essence of what it is to be human.

The definition of this concept has two parts. The first is that the person is friendly, generous, gentle, caring and compassionate. In other words, someone who will use their strengths on behalf of others – the weak, the poor, the ill – and not take advantage of anyone. This person treats others as he would be treated. And because of this they express the second part of the concept which concerns openness, large-heartedness. They share their worth. In doing so my humanity is recognised and becomes inextricably bound to theirs.

People with ubuntu are approachable and welcoming, their attitude is kindly and well disposed, they are not threatened by the goodness in others because their own esteem and self-worth is generated by knowing that they belong to a greater whole. To recast the Cartesian proposition, “I think, therefore I am”, ubuntu would phrase it “I am human because I belong”. Put another way “a person is a person through other people.”   No one comes into the world fully formed. We would not know how to think or walk or speak or behave unless we learned it from our fellow human beings. We need other human beings in order to be human. The solitary, isolated human is a contradiction in terms.

Because we need one another, our natural tendency is to be cooperative and helpful. If this was not true we would have died out as a species long ago consumed by our violence and hate. But we haven’t. We have kept on despite the evil and the wars that have brought so much suffering and misery down the centuries. We have kept on because we strive for harmony and community, a community not only of the living but also one that honours our forebears. This link with the past gives us a sense of continuity. A sense that we have created and create, societies that are meant to be for the greater good and we try and overcome anything that subverts our purpose. Our wars end and we seek to heal.

But anger, resentment, a lust for revenge, greed, even the aggressive competitiveness that rules so much of our contemporary world corrodes and jeopardizes our harmony. Ubuntu points out that those who seek to destroy and dehumanize are also victims. Victims, usually of a pervading ethos, be it a political ideology, an economic system, or a distorted religious conviction. Consequently they are as much dehumanised as those on whom they trample.

Tony Ducan



20 October, 2008


Several months ago I was asked to participate in focus group set up by the Synod’s Mission Participation Resource Unit. (Boy! Is that a mouthful!!)  The focus group involves me receiving four free copies of the magazine “Congregations” produced by the Alban Institute and commenting on the articles and hopefully using them in to inform and enhance ministry practise here at Pilgrim.

The first edition of the magazine that I have received has been devoted to Narrative Leadership – rediscovering the life-giving nature of stories and I want to say that last Sunday I hope many of you were able to do just that – rediscover the life-giving nature of our stories. Last Sunday five people (four planned and one, a gift of the Spirit) shared some of their faith story with us in worship. They reflected aloud on times when God/Jesus has come close to them. They shared intimate stories of faith and their stories were all different. Each of their connections with God was unique and in their sharing our worship was enhanced. A young woman brought close to God through her struggle with life-threatening illness, a father of a young family‘s struggle for belief, a woman passionately involved with God’s creation and an older man who can look back and see God’s fingerprints all over his life; and then the unexpected testimony of a man nearly broken by life’s experiences, learning to depend solely on a God working through God’s people.

For me all these stories contributed to one of the most moving and God-filled worship services that it has been my privilege to be part of.  As I see it, it mattered little that we agreed or disagreed with what was being said, for what we were privileged to hear were whispers of conversations others are having with God.  They were courageous enough to speak their faith aloud.

And then I read this snippit in “Congregations” from Margaret J Wheatley, who says, “There is no power greater than a community discovering what it cares about.  Ask,  ‘What’s possible?’ not ‘What’s wrong?’ Keep asking … Be brave enough to start a conversation that matters.”

“Be brave enough to start a conversation that matters.”  How well do we know each other?  On a Sunday morning I often wonder as I look around – what is really going on in the lives of the congregations?  Occasionally I am given glimpses, but more often than not we have learned to be cautious about what we share, even about what we believe. And in our caution we build barriers between. In our caution, misunderstandings occur.  In our caution we fail to hear when a conversation that matters is attempted.

I wonder, is our faith community here at Pilgrim safe enough for us to share our stories, stories of life, stories of faith?  Are we open and inclusive enough to share stories that differ greatly to our own?  Jesus the Christ loved telling stories but even more powerful, he loved listening to the stories of others. And in the listening and in the telling, the Kingdom of God was realised.

I’d like us to be more open to hearing each others stories and allowing the Spirit to create a wonderful story of community here at Pilgrim.

Tony Duncan



13 April, 2008

Being Sorry - Reflections on Reconciliation

It’s 2.00 o’clock on a Saturday afternoon at the back of Bourke. A place known to the aboriginal people there as Gundabooka. We’d been welcomed to the land a few hours earlier. We’d just been shown around the country by a Koori named Phil. He’s a ranger. He’s a man of faith. He’d just told us something about bush tucker. He’d shown us evidence of  centuries of aboriginal use of the land - rings of stones that had been used as bush ovens. Only the bottom stones are left now- so much has the land been scarred by erosion caused by sheep and cattle overgrazing.

He’d shown us some rock painting and he’d talked about Biami - the Creator.  He tells us of his Christian faith. And then something that leaves all of us speechless and some of us with tears in our eyes. He says sorry to us. Sorry if he or his people have caused any injury to us. Sorry for any hurt caused us intentionally or unintentionally. He’s a representative of  the oldest people of this ancient land, and he is saying sorry to us after he has shown us his country.

Most of us on this journey into reconciliation shake our heads. He’s saying sorry to us after all that’s been done by our people to his people. Some of us see him after and say our sorries to him. And I get to thinking.  Thinking about what his apology really means. We hardly know the man. Some amongst us have never met with aboriginal people before this journey into reconciliation. What does his sorry mean?

Perhaps he is right to say sorry. Perhaps that is a word all of us should be using to describe the state of Aboriginal and European relations. Our relationships are in a sorry mess. We all should feel sorry.  And on a theological level perhaps that is what our God was on about when he sent his son Jesus into the world. To say sorry.  For the sad state of the world. The good shepherd. The one who goes out and brings home the one sheep that has stayed. The good Shepherd doesn’t berate his sheep. He’s just sorry that it’s strayed and acts to save.  It’s his act of sorrow. The cross. Not for nothing is Jesus called the Man of sorrows.

Perhaps Phil, a follower of  the Christ is right. He sees how his people have been diminished by the treatment they have received at the hands of the newcomers and he’s sorry, sorry for his people and sorry for we newcomers who have also been diminished by what happens to aboriginal people in this land.

Later we go into Bourke we see shuttered shops. We see houses that have been wrecked, and worse still we hear of lives that have been wrecked, and we sense … what it means to be sorry.  Perhaps being sorry is a state. Perhaps we are being called to live the sorrowful life of the Christ and in living it we come to a place of reconciliation, not just with our Aboriginal sisters and brothers but also our God. And who knows - if enough of  us worldwide learn to say and live sorry - perhaps we wouldn’t be living in a world that tolerates Israeli and Palestinians tearing each other apart, that allows the strongest to run roughshod over the weakest. That permits the wealthy to exploit the poor.

We should all be saying sorry.

Tony Duncan




6 April, 2008


Whilst studying to become a minister one of the theologians whose works we were required to study was a man named Jürgen Moltmann.  I remember clearly the day, in the first week of our course, when I was introduced to his works. We were given a two page photocopy from his book, “The Crucified God” and optimistically told by our tutor that by the end of the year we would be able to make sense of it. For me it certainly was optimistically because I’m not sure I understand even now all that Maltmann was saying.

But either I’m getting more theologically literate or Maltmann is becoming less obtuse, for I came across the other day a quote from Maltmann that I think I understand and what’s more one that I can thoroughly endorse.  I found it under the heading of “New kind of living together”.  He gives six marks of Christian community based on his understanding of the Gospel, they are:

No one alone with his or her problems
No one has to conceal his or her disabilities
There are NOT some who have say and others who have nothing to say
Neither old nor little ones isolated
One bears the other even when it is unpleasant & there is disagreement
One can also at times leave the other in peace when the other needs it

Now I don’t know about you, but I could live in a community like that. Imagine if our entire community was run along these lines. But sadly even among church communities these are hard guidelines to live up to.

Nonetheless Maltmann has not conjured these points out of thin air. Jesus, as I see it, lived his life out according to these principles because he believed that we are all children of God. “Suffer the little children to come to me,” he said. In his ministry he was open to all, and even when he was being tortured on the Cross he was able to forgive and forbear. When people, like Nicodemus and the rich young man failed to respond, he left them in peace.

The question is, is Pilgrim a community where, no one is alone with his or her problems; where no one has to conceal his or her disabilities; where there are not some who have say and others who have nothing to say; where neither old nor little ones are isolated; where one bears the other even when it is unpleasant and there is disagreement; and where one can also at times leave the other in peace when the other needs it? For this I believe is how we’re supposed to live as Christians sisters and brothers.

Tony Duncan



30 March, 2008

Someone once wrote that the business of a church in the heart of the city is to “keep alive the rumour that there is a God.”  And since coming to Pilgrim nearly three years ago I guess that is what I have seen as my task. Not so much for the faithful worshippers here at Pilgrim, but for the many more who would see church as a foreign land. As I see it, making Pilgrim, and all it stands for, visible, is at the heart of our mission here in Launceston.

And it’s more than chopping down a few trees to show people that there is in fact a church building here, although I must admit I have people say in passing that they had no idea what a beautiful church Pilgrim is. No, “keep alive the rumour that there is a God.” has more to do with helping people to see the love of God in action.

Pilgrim Walkway is crucial in that regard. The cross, the palms and the Easter ribbons that have recently decorated our walkway, are symbols of what we hold as important, for those who use the walkway as a thoroughfare. Bringing the “holy” into the world if you like, showing that our God is not a rumour confined to a locked church building but out in the world. Similarly the badges that now decorate the glass in our walkway tell more about our God of justice and the Pilgrim community. I know people are stopping to read and recently I had person come into the office asking where he could buy the badges. And I know that there will be others not connected to the church who stop to read this “As I see it” on their way through.

But for me one of the more important aspects of keeping alive “the rumour that there is a God,” is the midweek communion service. This small reflective communion service is for me the highlight of my week. It was started specifically for those in the city, to give them a quiet place in the busyness of the city. Although only a small congregation we have had a series of visitors who call in, in response to the small sign in the walkway. And it’s a service where people can unburden themselves. On a number of occasions tears are shed freely, and people are sent out refreshed and renewed. At this quiet service God is more than a rumour. So if in the middle of the week you need a pick me up why not come to our Mid-Week communion and go on to Maggie’s Cafe for a snack.

Tony Duncan




23 March, 2008


Easter has come early this year!! In fact you’d have to be 95 years old to remember that last time Easter came this early – 1913! And none of us will be around for the next time Easter comes this early – 2228!  So March 23 is really early!

But Easter came even earlier for me this year.  It came on Tuesday as I sat and listened to the stories of six young women. They were all members of a special group called New Pin whose aim is to equip, parents whose children are at risk, with the coping skills most of us take for granted.

Each of them told of life lived in the depths of despair – “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” Each knew the desperation that causes a mother to enter down a path of self destruction, as they abused their bodies with alcohol and drugs and suicidal behaviour. Each of them at one time or another felt their children would be better off without them.

And on Tuesday, I listened to their resurrection stories. Stories of a mother of two fleeing an abusive husband who contemplated giving away her children, brought back from the brink by New Pin workers who taught her how to value herself, who loved her back to her senses. Of a young woman barely into her twenties who was given the strength to stop her drug taking when she realised that she loved her children more than her drugs, led to that point by New Pin workers’ unconditional love for her.

Yes, Easter came early this year and it came in the most unexpected place. Not in a church, but out in the community, mediated, not by good Christians, but by people whose hearts clearly know Jesus’ message of love and liberation. In truly caring for these women and their children, the New Pin workers have helped to birth a miracle in each of their lives. They have been freed to live the lives God would want for them.

I was asked by a bystander on Tuesday if New Pin had any connection with a church, and saw the confused look on his face when I said no. Their stories sounded like good old fashioned testimonies, testifying to the Christian truth that new life is always possible, even in the darkest place if we are will to submit ourselves to Love.

This Easter may you and yours truly experience newness of life in Jesus Christ.

Tony Duncan



16 March, 2008

Last Saturday I celebrated a wedding at Pilgrim. It was a joyous occasion with the church nearly full with well-dressed guests. But it was an unusual occurrence. Firstly, it’s unusual for so many people to turn up at church so well dressed, and secondly I’ve noticed that fewer and fewer people want a church wedding. Of the eleven weddings that I’ve officiated at since coming here almost three years ago, only 6 have been in the Pilgrim church. And prior to coming to Pilgrim, I officiated at an average of 15-20 a year, nearly all in the church. And all this got me to thinking.

The fact that people who attend weddings are well dressed is hardly surprising. Weddings, whether in the church or elsewhere, are  joyous occasions and people love to get dressed up, it’s only good manners. Getting dressed up for church, however, in main is no longer required. Gone are the hats and gloves for the women and men are no longer constricted to suit and tie when they come to worship. And that is a good thing. Worship is not about us. We don’t need to be at our best when we come because God’s relationship with us goes beyond fine clothes. Worship for most of us is not a one off special occasion and for most of us it about relaxing with an old Friend, where we can be truly accepted just as we are. So save your good clothes for special one off celebrations.

More intriguing however is the increasing tendency for rites of passage rituals like wedding and funerals to go elsewhere. We’re almost at the stage when, Australia wide, more weddings and funerals are conducted by secular celebrants than religious ones. It probably reflects the increasing secularization of our society, but it also has something to do with our community’s view of religion in general and of the church in particular. There have been times when the church has brought this upon itself with the natural demands we make around Christian weddings and funerals. I always think that God and Jesus need to get a guernsey on such occasions and there are some who think this demand unreasonable. But there have also been occasions when we have been less than gracious, occasions when we have made unreasonable demands that individuals be part of our fellowship before we marry or bury them, occasion when we have used our trusted position at a funeral or a wedding to conduct an evangelistic campaign during the homily. Such behaviour simply reinforces the view that the church is totally out of touch with the majority in our community.

As I see it weddings and funerals are wonderful opportunities to give non-church people a positive experience of church. It’s a chance to challenge the stereotypes that paint clergy and church-going Christians as humourless and judgemental. And it is always an occasion to proclaim the all-inclusive love of our God to people who seldom if ever venture inside a church. And if our grand churches intimidate some, why not go to where they are in parks and gardens, in crematoria and funeral chapels. After all that’s how Jesus ministered.

Tony Duncan



9th March, 2008

This Sunday, Jenny and I will be worshipping with 150 people, children, teenagers and adults at the KUCA campout at Ross. We’re both looking forward to it but know that we’ll be exhausted afterwards. But neither of us could resist the opportunity. Children and young people always keep you on your toes theologically. They have not yet learned to cover their feelings with politeness. If something is boring, they tell you so. If something doesn’t make sense they are not afraid of asking the simple question, the question many adults hold to themselves lest they seem foolish. That’s why children are so important for our church. They keep us honest, if we’re willing to listen. And worship without children, as I see it, lacks something. Not for me “generational apartheid” where your age dictates which service you go to. Let’s worship together. Not for nothing did Jesus say, “Suffer the little children to come to me.”

So on that point let me share with you a story from one of my Lenten Disciplines called “For Crying Out Loud.” By John Shea in “Daybreaks” – Daily Reflections for Lent and Easter. 

A woman, in her late forties and stylishly dressed, approached the priest as he stood outside the church after the 9.45am Mass. “That baby screamed throughout your entire sermon. Why didn’t you do something? You should have told the parents to take the child out. Didn’t that crying bother you?”  In fact it did bother him. He’d lost his train of thought a couple of times, but he managed to get back on track. Preachers quickly learn to ride the baby competition. This does not mean they win the battle to be heard. It just means that they do not stop, break down and cry themselves.


But there is something profoundly disturbing about asking a crying baby to leave. Besides the embarrassment to the parents, there are deeper issues involved in this very minor moment of liturgy. Could it be that the nature of Eucharist welcomes crying babies?

There may be dozens of practical reasons why babies should be left at home, but there is one overwhelming reason why they should be present. They are one of us. Crying comes with the baby territory. (Actually it comes with the adult territory too; but we flee to the bathroom and do it more quietly.) People may try to quiet babies but no one begrudges them a good wail. When they are there the human condition is rounded out. And their occasional or sustained outbursts remind us of a fact that liturgies often leave us in doubt about. We are alive.

The author leaves us with a thought for the day - Embrace crying as a sign of life.

I’d like to add to it by saying - Embrace our children as a sign of life.

Tony Duncan



2nd March, 2008

Last Wednesday whilst many of our fellow citizens were preparing for the Launceston Cup, I found myself in gaol, or at least in what qualifies for gaol here in the centre of Launceston. It came as a great surprise to me that there is a prison less than 200 metres from Pilgrim. Our police station contains the biggest suite of cells I have ever seen in the many police stations I have visited. The lock-up contains about 40 cells for short term prisoners on remand or awaiting a court hearing. But the place I found myself in, was deep in the bowels of the building, under the main cell block. Here, five long-term convicted prisoners live, some for several years. They have chosen to live in the cells to be near to their families and they work during the day in the police complex, earning a little money and preparing for their release.  This section is indeed a prison.

I was there at the request of a group of Christians who have decided, in partnership with the prison authorities, to do something about the living conditions of these five long-term prisoners. It’s the same group who were responsible for last year’s Invermay Primary School’s “Backyard Blitz.” That particular project was about the Christians of Launceston giving something back to the community of Launceston, a project of pure grace, no strings attached, mirroring what God has done for us.

Well perhaps this new project stems from Jesus’ desire to “proclaim release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind.” The project intends to improve the living conditions of the five long-term prisoners by creating a communal living area with a small kitchenette in it. In addition, one of the unused cells will be used as a small gym area for the prisoners. But for me the most exciting part of the project is to paint murals on the claustrophobic walls. There are no windows whatsoever in the narrow corridors and I found my short stay there very oppressive. The project intends to create windows of hope to lessen the oppressive and claustrophobic feel of the place.

How can Pilgrim help? Well most of the internal structural work is being done by a small group of tradesmen. Perhaps some of the artists in the congregation would be interested in creating a mural, but I think our major contribution could be in providing some of the new furnishing that will be required for the gym, the kitchenette and the lounge area, especially given that, unlike Invermay Primary there will be limited access to the site.

Once again we have an opportunity to reach out beyond Pilgrim, this time to our hidden neighbours living so close to the church.

Tony Duncan




24 February, 2008

Being a church in the centre of a city, even a small regional city like Launceston, can be difficult. At Pilgrim we have parking difficulties. There is no recognised residential neighbourhood for us to relate to and we suffer from not having a school community close to us to reach out to. When I arrived here first I wondered how I could minister in such a place, so foreign to my two previous suburban churches with their well defined mission areas. Well, this month a few things have happened that have encouraged me to think that Pilgrim does have a very clear mission and can bring the Good News of Christ to a much larger constituency than a local neighbourhood.

A few days after Pancake Day this month, I received an encouraging letter from one of our federal politicians who had taken part in the pancake races in the civic square. She congratulated Pilgrim Church in its efforts to bring church, community and business together with such an event. The money raised has gone to UnitingCare, but there were over 20 Pilgrim congregation members who benefited by providing a venue for bringing diverse people together.

A week later we had a wonderful opening ceremony of Neshan, an art installation of badges, in the city library. Neshan was put together by an Iranian refugee who had spent several years in prison in Iran for his activism, only to be placed in detention for a further five years upon his arrival in Australia. Ardishir Gholipur’s exhibition of badges reflects some of his passion for justice and serves as an outward symbol of the pain and suffering he has experienced in his life. This joint venture with the City Library has enabled Pilgrim to reach out to another group of diverse people who like Pilgrim are passionate about social justice. The feedback we have received about our involvement in Nashan has been very positive with one person expressing surprise that a church would be involved in such a venture. Yet, social justice advocacy has always been a key part of Pilgrim’s mission to the community.

And on Thursday night we hosted a renowned theologian, Dr Val Webb who brought new insights into how we see our God. Her lecture brought people from as far as field as Penguin eager to be challenged in their faith journey. Progressive theology is something else Pilgrim has to offer people and goes much wider than the local neighbourhood.

Next week we will also host a visiting monk from the Taize community who will lead a Taize service next Tuesday at lunch time. This service together with the meditative communion service we offer each Wednesday at lunchtime is an offering Pilgrim has to yet another group of people.

So this reflection upon a busy February has given me much heart as to the substantial ministry that flows forth from Pilgrim. From the fun of pancake day to the social activism of Neshan, from the challenge of progressive theology to the mysticism of Taize, Pilgrim has much to offer. For me this month has done much to define who we are as God’s people in the centre of Launceston.

Tony Duncan



17 February, 2008

For many people Wednesday 13th February 2008 was a red letter day, the day the Government of Australia formally apologised to those indigenous peoples who had been injured by government policies down through the years of European habitation. I, along with countless others, was one of those who shed a tear on Wednesday as I watched the government’s apology unfurl.

And as I listened to the stories of injustice and heartbreak from both our Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition, my mind went back to the mid-seventies when as a young social worker in country NSW, I discovered my own story of sadness and separation. I was then supervising a teenaged Ward of the State named Maxine, who I discovered had a mother and 6 other siblings still living. She knew nothing about them. The children had all been made wards of the state in the sixties and all seven were placed with different foster parents across the length and breadth of the NSW. Some had managed to stay in contact with their mother and had even found their way back to her, but Maxine and a few of the younger ones had not. Indeed Maxine’s name had been changed and she had been prevented from learning anything about her origins. As she grew older, she became more and more desperate to discover who she was. With some help from the Aboriginal community and the Department I was able to bring about reunions for all the children and their mother.

I mention this story to indicate only that the issue of the Stolen Generations is not some remote historical event that does not touch us personally, as some would have it, but something that was occurring as late as the 1960’s.

I have no doubt that many of the removals of children from parents were necessary, indeed I have been witness to some of the situations that led to court actions. For those situations I do not apologise. But for others where evidence was flimsy and where no effort was made to keep families together, I do apologise. And certainly an apology has been necessary to those like Maxine, where little or no effort was made to keep families together.

Given all of the above, I have been saddened and angered by the graceless and ignorant attitude of many who claim no apology was necessary. The vehemence of some of the apology critics astounds me. The lack of understanding of the effect of family separation saddens me deeply. If our local newspaper is to be believed some 66% of it’s readers deemed that an apology was unnecessary!  Where’s the compassion? Where’s the grace?

I acknowledge that many good things occurred when children were taken into care. But the good care they were afforded was simply their due. But equally many lives were ruined by coming into care and this is what we need to apologise for, so that healing might begin not only for the indigenous peoples of this land but also for those of us who were part of the system that removed children and even more importantly for our nation. An apology has given all of us a chance for a new beginning.

Tony Duncan




1
0 February, 2008

A
s some of you may know I have a Muslim son-in law, and each year come Ramadan, the holy month for Muslims, my son-in law Zafer fasts from sunrise to sunset. He’s not particularly devout, and certainly he is far from being a fundamentalist, but he still fasts and my daughter has joined him in his fasting.  I have to say that I am impressed by this act of piety designed to focus their body, mind and soul on the Being that has created them.

So this Lent especially I am trying to retrieve some of the spiritual disciplines I remembered practising as a child, brought up as a Catholic. I remember clearly choosing to give up something for Lent each year.  Sadly, however for most Protestants, Lent is a non-event. And that’s a pity.  Jesus, in preparing himself for his ministry we are told in the Gospels, chose to go off by himself, to fast and to meditate. It was his preparation for the intensive ministry that was to follow, and the gospel stories tell of how such disciplines brought him closer to God.

The early church took Jesus’ example and used the forty days leading up to Easter as a time when new initiates to the faith, those who were to be baptised on Easter morning, would fast and prepare themselves for their new life in Christ.  So I wonder if this Lent, as we focus on Jesus journey to Cross and Tomb, we too might choose to focus our minds on some kind of Lenten discipline. It might be choosing to go without something that we enjoy, perhaps using the money otherwise spent for some particular cause. It may be choosing to participate in one of the Lenten studies that begin around Launceston during this coming week, or perhaps even embarking in some kind of private devotion designed to focus our body, mind and soul on the Being that has created us. Whatever the discipline, I know that we will be richly blessed.

So let me leave you with the words of a song from the Hymn Book:

May this Lenten discipline,
which we undertake with love,
turn our minds to things above.

Now we fast that we may feast
where the Lord of life presides
may our hunger be increased
for the bread which he provides.

As we keep this Lent with prayer
and from pleasures are withdrawn
minds and bodies we prepare
for the joy of Easter dawn.

Tony Duncan



3 February, 2008


When I was training as a social worker I spent some time in a residential care unit for children with intellectual disabilities. And one of the abiding memories of the place was a little boy with Downs Syndrome who kept apologizing. I can hear him now, “I’m sorry. I’ll be goo-ood!” Not that he’d done much wrong, but it was his learned way of developing relationships. And I wonder if that’s not what saying you’re sorry is all about – developing relationships. In apologizing first, he is paving the way to entering relationship with me.  Hence my dismay at sections of the Australian community who are unwilling to apologize, to say sorry to the indigenous people of Australia because in this case they do have something to be sorry about.

I started by social work career in NSW one year after the dismantling of the Aboriginal Welfare Board. The Department I worked for took over the functions of the old Board and with the responsibility came all the baggage. We were the successors of those who had removed children without just cause, and I discovered that if I was to develop any sort of relationship with indigenous clients I had to acknowledge the wrong done to them. This was no easy task given the fear and resentment that formed a wall between us.

So as I see it, before we can empower indigenous people to improve their living conditions, we need to say sorry, not for any personal injury we may have caused, but for the systemic violence done over generations to the indigenous people of this land. It’s the least we do if we are fair dinkum about entering into relationship with them. Tragically, it is a sad reflection of our money-obsessed society that some have linked the tendering of an apology solely with claims for damages. They claim that an apology will open a litigious avalanche of damages claims. Whilst I believe that some form of restitutions need to be made, it remains secondary to an apology. Money does little to mend hurts, but saying sorry can lead to healing of relationships soured by decades of distrust and enmity. It’s a way of starting again.

As a Christian I see saying sorry as central to turning our lives around. Acknowledging the wrong in any relationship is the only way of starting over whether it be in a marriage relationship, a neighbourhood dispute or any injury done to the other. Christians worship a God who in Jesus Christ is only too willing to help us start over. Saying sorry to God is a first step in turning our lives around to working in harness with our God. Similarly, saying sorry to the indigenous people of Australia is a first step in turning our community life around so that we can work in harness for the betterment of our nation, Australia.

Tony Duncan





















.




















































 
 

Email: pilgrim@tassie.net.au

Phone: (03) 6331 8757

LIST OF SERMONS

 
Home   /   About Us   /  As I See it   /   UnitingCare Services   /   Pilgrim Child Care   /   Notice Board   /   Links

Disclaimer:     © 2003 Pilgrim Uniting Church